GreenTongue:
What does "Space Opera" mean to you and what do you feel are good game and media examples?
For me "Space Opera" has a scope, scale, and focus that a lot of Sci-Fi leaves off.
Scope: While Space Opera often features a good amount of "galactic conflict", it's actually the individual conflict that matters most. The journey the hero takes, their arc, rather then the "Red vs Blue" nature of the backdrop conflict. The original Original Star Wars and the Prequels, both score well here, the Sequels flop, Firefly was all about this, as was Killjoys (though I think they missed a few marks) and Dark Matter was steeping in it.
Scale: Vast, like westerns,
time is spent between planets, between cities, time in the 'wilderness' to ficus on the characters rather than the plot or 'cinematics'. Scale-wise the original 3 Star Wars movies fall into Space Opera for me, the Prequels not quite as much, and the Sequels not at all. Star Trek can (but often doesn't), Firefly did, but Killjoys not very much. Dark Matter was actually very good here, despite near-instantaneous travel, it still felt like places were remote, distant, cut off.
Focus: Here I'm not sure I'm using a good term, but for me Space opera focuses less on the 'technology' than on the personal, the mythical/mystical/psychological features. Again Star Wars, all three trilogies lodge here firmly, as does Firefly and Dark Matter (kinda with DM), but Killjoys goes back and forth, some times it's softer "sci-fi", some times it's harder.
For me Killjoys was more "Cyberpunk in Space" than Space Opera... Dark Matter kinda fits that as well (so does Firefly), but then Cyberpunk is very Western in it's themes, so it stands to reason that Space Westerns would feel rather more Cyberpunky than Soap Operatic). I actually classify both Firefly and Dark Matter as Space Westerns, Killjoy as SpacePunk, and Star Trek as SciFi).
This message had punctuation tweaked by the user at 23:39, Fri 07 Jan 2022.