Yeah, I thought it'd be something like that from your previous post.  :(

What you describe there isn't really a single roll of 3d20, but three separate rolls of 1d20, against three different target numbers.
Easy enough to do as a single roll in a tabletop environment, where you have access to different colours/sizes of dice, but here it has to be done as three separate rolls, unless jase decides to code for this system.

I already have.  Well, in 1.5 I have.  I'm afraid you'll have to wait for the next version, whenever it eventually arrives.

There ya go, Kalijo.  What's yer problem?  :p

Hmm, Jase, if you are at it, mind to add the dice system that I described as "DSA"?

As I said, its easy.

3 rolls of W20 vs. 3 Attributes.
A positive skill number can be used to replace missing points.
A negative skill number is substracted from all attrributes. So in my example a skill of -1 in climbing would reduce my STR to 6 :(.

So the only imput needed would be the effective skill value (after application of all modifiers).

The "result" is how many skill points you have left over after doing the whole roll. 0 skill points is barely successfull, 10+ is a masterly success, 18+ is perfect. Also most skills (and especially spells) do use that number directly.

For example Mara just used a spell called Satuarias Magnificence. I made the roll with all 5 skill points left over. This results in a bonus of 5 points on all bewitch/charm rolls in the next 5 hours.

As you see, this system might be a bit more complicated then the usual "x dice added roll", but gives lotsa information to the GM, be it succeeding or missing.

Oh yeah, I forgot: duple or triple 1 or 20 rolls are of course rather interessting results.
This message was last edited by the user at 11:39, Tue 15 Mar 2005.

The dice roller just needs to know how many die are being rolled, what size  the die are, what the modifiers are and if there's anything like a target number, re-rolling, etc etc.

If you can explain the system in those terms then I most certainly can.  Alas your current description leaves me more than just a little confused.  I don't even know what a W20 is!

Ups sorry, a W(ürfel)20 is of course a d(ice)20.

OK, efficently you'll need 4 input variables: the value of the 3 attributes, and the modified skill value.

Then it works like this:

If the modified skill value is a negative number, substract it from all 3 attribute values, and set the skill value (internally) to 0.

Throw 1d20, target number is the first attribut value. If unsuccessfull, substract the difference between the roll and the target number from the skill value.

Do so as well for the second and third attribute value.

If after this three rolls (and possible reductions) the skill value is still positive or 0, the whole roll is a success.

Print the left over skill value.

If the number is negative, the whole roll is a failure. Print out the amount of the skill value (allowing the GM to judge the size of the failure).

If two or more of the rolls habe been 1 or 20, print it out instead of the skill value (2*20 is always a failure, 3*20 is a catasthropic failure, with 1s the opposite).

Alas I don't think the current dice roller can cope with such a complicated rolling system, there's not three input areas for the dice.  Will see what I can do...

What's the opposite of a catasthropic failure?

A miracle.

Hello... :)
I guess all we need is just a roller that does not arrange the values. That would already be great.

If you are interested in the rolling system of DSA (the dark eye), I made a rolling program a while ago, but it is written in C. Just translated it into english.
http://www.tu-harburg.de/~siak0539/tmp/diceroller.c

Actually, I think just a Target Number would be nice... as an optional feature.

Target# for success of fail.

The Target number could also have the following options (or higher, or lower is equal to, is not equal to, etc)

Examples:

Stelerp needs to roll 18 or above to hit his opponent.

(Target 18 or higher) Roll 1d20+5 (Plus reason for roll)

Stelerp rolled 13, (Reason for Roll); Stelerp failed to roll above 18.

or

Stelerp rolled 23, (Reason for Roll); Stelerp succeded in rolling above 18.

If a target value isn't selected, the dice roller stays as is.

I thought there was a target number function.

Anyway, not everyone knows the number they need ot hit something.

Well, the opposite of a catastrophic failure isn't a miracle (except if you play a priest char). But its extremely beneficial. If you have a very nasty GM it could even be TOO beneficial. :D usually 3*1 will result in an automatic raise of the skill also.

Yes, there is a target number function, which can be used with some of the Systems that you can select, usually the ones that require the user to keep track of how many successes he achieves with a handful of dice.

Edit:  Because I forgot something.  :o
This message was last edited by the user at 18:01, Tue 15 Mar 2005.

Sorcerer system, without the sorting, would be useful in D&D/d20 areas, particularly high level ones. Instead of 5 or more attack rolls in the buffer, 1 roll. Instead of 30 or so separate rolls for a dispel magic, one roll (after a post describing their order)  etc... easier for everyone to reference, easier to read, less likelt to forget a roll since the buffer will effectively be much larger, just easier in general. Just about anything that uses sets of similar but separate rolls could use the unsorted version, I think.

I don't know about difficulty, but if a check box were in the sorcerer system for sorted or unsorted, or if the two could be labeled sorcerer sorted, and sorcerer unsorted, I'd be very happy.

Well, the One Roll Engine, like the Sorcerer System, will allow you to roll up to 20 dice, and will give details of what was rolled on each individual die.  There is no restriction on the type of die used, so it would work for d20, just as well as anything else.

The results are sorted into descending order.

In RPoL v1.5 there will be an unsorted version of the One Roll Engine.  :)
This message was last edited by the user at 19:56, Fri 18 Mar 2005.

This would be very helpful, as this shortens DSA rolls to one roll = one line.

For those ever doubting the randomness of the dice roller, here's the output of a program called 'ent'.  Ent is a Pseudorandom Number Sequence Test Program.  http://www.fourmilab.ch/random

Program output is in green, my comments are in blue.

Entropy = 7.999965 bits per byte.

Optimum compression would reduce the size
of this 5000000 byte file by 0 percent.
A file that can be compressed because of predictable patterns has Entropy of about 4.9 (meaning compression would reduce it by about 38%).  Here RPoL's random generator clearly demonstrates it really has no predictable pattern (8 being a perfect score, 7.999965 being close enough!)

Chi square distribution for 5000000 samples is 242.74, and randomly
would exceed this value 50.00 percent of the times.
"The chi-square test is the most commonly used test for the randomness of data, and is extremely sensitive to errors in pseudorandom sequence generators."

50% = Win.

Arithmetic mean value of data bytes is 127.4919 (127.5 = random).
Based on a binary file, each character can range from the mathematical value of 0 to 255, inclusive.  Thus the average should be, as stated by the program, 127.5.

And for those thinking "oooh, but it's a bit below average" well two things; it's 0.006% below average, and other runs returned values above 127.5.

Monte Carlo value for Pi is 3.143094057 (error 0.05 percent).
Some complicated algorithm.  Bad algorithms will get above 1% here.

Serial correlation coefficient is 0.000065 (totally uncorrelated = 0.0).
For those who complain about groupings of similar numbers.  This is the extent to which each byte depends upon the previous byte.


The dubious and inquisitive who want to run their own analysis on the file can  find it at; http://beta.rpol.net/test/random.dat.  It's a 5,000,000 byte (~5mb) binary file.

That's all well and good, but nowhere in there does it say, unequivocally, that the dice roller doesn't hate me, personally, with an obsessive enmity that would make Captain Ahab look cool, calm and collected.  :(

;)

Oh it's not the dice roller!

No ron, it's the website owner ;)

No, it's not.  It's everybody.

I dunno

I don't know you enough to hate you.

Mildly dislike however.... ;)

Well, we can hardly be expected to believe that after all those outpourings of "We lvoe you, bigbadron!!!111" when you were married recently. ;)

Hey, I like him. He's amusing.

[bs]And there's nothing wrong with the dice roller, it's just on a very special diet. PCs are high in fiber while low in carbs, the ultimate food, and of course in order to work as hard as it does to roll all of the dice it does every day, it needs all the energy it can get. So be kind to the dice roller, offer it three helpings of PC daily.[/bs]

*shifty eyes* No, I was not paid by the dice roller to say that. I have no idea what you're talkig about.....
This message was last edited by the user at 07:40, Thu 14 Apr 2005.

Yeah, I think he's a good guy.  Even if he is big and bad.  Did I just say an oxymoron? :)

I'm glad jase posted that stuff comparing the dice roller's randomness.  I was under the (mistaken) impression that it seeded its random function by checking out something in your system time.  So if I was rolling multiple rolls, I'd try to post like one every 5 seconds or so, so that if the first one was good I'd have something of a chance of getting the first roll again.  Superstitious?  Oh, yes.  Any truth behind it?  I don't think so.  Will I continue doing that?  Uhm, probably not.

I was under this impression from one game where I rolled up a character -- stats ranged from 1 to 8 and I rolled six 6's then a 5.
This message was last edited by the user at 18:40, Thu 14 Apr 2005.